🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly return the bill for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several EU countries
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence comparable discussions in additional member states